421-a

    Dear Governor Cuomo, State Senators, and State Assemblypersons,

    We oppose reviving 421a tax abatements in any form. Please vote no on any legislation or agreement that attempt to bring this kind of tax abatement back to life. They are giveaways that end up subsidizing the wealthy and the real estate industry: they do not bring neighborhoods the kind of development that that is actually needed.

    Moreover, the abatements are far too expensive relative to the benefits they provide. We’d be wasting $8.4 billion dollars over 10 years! Please do not allow such agreements and legislation to move forward.



    Artist Manifesto

      First Name (required)

      Last Name (required)

      Profession in the arts (required)

      Your Email (required)

      Your Address

      Your Comment

      Marx Brothers Playground Alienation Bill

        First Name (required)

        Last Name (required)

        Your Email (required)

        Your Address

        Me Too, Protect Tribeca

          First Name (required)

          Last Name (required)

          Neighborhood of Residence (required)

          Your Email (required)

          Your Address

          Your Comment

          New Yorkers for a Human Scaled City

            Save Governors Island, Stop the Rezonings: Support the Community Declaration on the Future of New York (#3)

              First Name *

              Last Name *

              Email *

              Zip/Postal Code*

              STOP THE ABUSE OF AIR RIGHTS TRANSFERS AT PIER 40

                Subject

                Re: Proposed Amendment of the Zoning Resolution relating to Article VIII, Chapter 9 (Special Hudson River Park District), N160308ZRM

                Dear Elected Official,

                I urge you to ask the City Council to postpone the November 1 hearing on the above-mentioned proposal for air rights transfers from Pier 40 to Washington Street. Express your opposition to this dangerous proposal because it not only oversimplifies a tremendously complicated public policy problem, it symbolizes bad public policy and undermines confidence in government.

                The proposal establishes a dangerous precedent of minting air rights over piers and public waterways to facilitate luxury development. It even does so in a high-risk flood area. While we understand that enabling legislation may have been passed by Governor Cuomo to specifically promote this deal, the unusually secretive planning process - revealed by DNAInfo's FOIL requests - makes the deal appear to be mostly about manipulation of air rights in favor of hyper-density rather than a project undertaken to further the public good.

                The case highlights the fact that the city’s present regulatory process for managing air rights is deficient in the extreme. There is no framework for assessing the cumulative impact of these transfers on neighborhoods “receiving areas.” And in this case, the process has brought about secretive horse-trading between powerful interests that undermines public confidence.

                The poor judgment shown by City Planning and Hudson River Park Trust to rush this through makes it clear that the existing system for regulating air rights is too weak. Under the current system, air rights transfers produce multiple noxious effects that damage the wider public good and the long-term welfare of city residents. These include destruction of the city landscape, mismanagement of waterways, the placement of excessively tall buildings on low and mid-rise blocks, over-building in flood-prone waterfronts, and the blocking of public light, air, and views. None of these issues are managed in the current regulatory process which amounts to a mere set of bureaucratic procedures.

                Our city needs a moratorium on air rights transfers until a better system for regulating air rights transfers can receive the public debate that a meaningful democracy deserves.

                Accommodating the mega-projects of developers is not the way that we should fund Hudson River Park, which has become an albatross around the city’s neck. The proper solution would be to seek changes in the park's underlying enabling legislation to permit management of the space as a state or city park. Until that happens, the stewards of the park are going to continue to overwhelm the city with outrageous schemes to fill their ever-increasing deficit, schemes that only create more problems than they solve.

                Given the documents obtained by DNAInfo from City Planning and the Hudson River Park Trust (see DNAInfo, "How the St. John's Deal was Done"), we are convinced there are also serious issues of due process and manipulation of the land-use process that need judicial review. In addition, the City Planning Commission's documents on this question (see http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/planning/download/pdf/about/cpc/160308.pdf) are filled with missing information related to plans, maps, and attachments. This oversight has prevented civic organizations from studying this massively important issue in anticipation of a hearing.

                Postpone the hearing scheduled for Nov. 1 for several weeks after the presidential election. That would give time for a meaningful public discussion of this proposal and its potential unintended negative consequences.

                We urge you to testify and object to this proposal.

                Your Optional, Additional Message to the letter above: *


                Letter recipients













































































































































































































































                First Name *

                Last Name *

                Email *

                Street *

                Street 2

                City *

                State *

                Zip/Postal Code *

                Stop the Abuse of Public Assets

                  Subject

                  Your Letter:

                  There are many cases of abuse of the public realm happening right now in New York City and we urge you to use the powers of your office to stop them. Here are but two examples:

                  The Department of City Planning should not be proposing a text amendment that gives away - in a terrible, uneconomic deal that is bad for the people of New York - 110,000 square feet of public-private plaza and arcade space along Water Street. If such a deal happens at all, there should be a more serious economic study as to what citizens of New York might gain and lose by it. Any rents from the in-fill of the public arcades should accrue to the public.

                  The spot-zoned towers in Inwood at 4650 and 4566 Broadway should not be allowed at such an excessive height that they shadow a public park and the Cloisters museum and ruin the famously human-scaled neighborhood of Inwood. Increased density and affordable housing does not have to mean out-of-context high-rises!

                  Your Optional, Additional Message to the letter above: *


                  Letter recipients













































































































































































































































                  First Name *

                  Last Name *

                  Email *

                  Street *

                  Street 2

                  City *

                  State *

                  Zip/Postal Code *

                  Take Action: Fox Guarding Henhouse

                    First Name *

                    Last Name *

                    Email *

                    Zip/Postal Code *

                    Tall Buildings

                      First Name (required)

                      Last Name (required)

                      Profession in the arts (required)

                      Your Email (required)

                      Your Address

                      Your Comment

                      Voter Pledge